[HamWAN PSDR] Beacon Tower-Capital Park Backbone Link

Kenny Richards richark at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 17:38:38 PDT 2018


Another possible benefit, if we figure out how to make the 3.4Ghz solution
work between Beacon/CP, is it could be re-used between CP and Queen Anne.

I totally understand Bart's point, having common standards is important and
has benefits. I think what Doug is suggesting is that maybe this is a case
where we need a new standard. We have hit a situation that the old
approaches are not working, so lets look for a new one.



On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:33 PM, Doug Kingston <dpk at randomnotes.org> wrote:

> First, about access:  ACS has full access, round the clcck to Beacon and
> Capitol Park limited only by our COMT's (Mark, Carl, Doug, Randy, Casey)
> availability.  Bringing third parties requires about a week to establish a
> training mission number.  If we can do the work ourselves, then only our
> schedules are factors.
>
> Thank you Nigel for your detailed response on the reuse point.  I am
> guessing from this that there is no objection in principle to trying to put
> this link in place.  We just need to fine the most compatible and
> affordable solution.  Randy has started researching this but we should
> double down on this.
>
> -Doug-
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Bart Kus <me at bartk.us> wrote:
>
>> Well, since you asked "why not":
>>
>> One of the advantages we've found with keeping things on a compatible
>> band is the ad-hoc ability to link dishes to sectors during emergencies, or
>> use dishes and sectors for spectral analysis on the one common band.
>>
>> Another advantage is the uniformity of config / interface / automation by
>> using the same vendor.  Don't need to train folks on special procedures or
>> write exceptions into automation.
>>
>> --Bart
>>
>>
>> On 3/29/2018 4:45 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/29/18 7:38 PM, Doug Kingston wrote:
>>>
>>>> For example... Can we reuse a PtoP 5GHz frequency with high isolation
>>>> (shielding)?
>>>>
>>> Why not use 3.4 GHz UBNT radios?  We have a link here in Tampa at 16.2
>>> miles
>>> across Tampa Bay running at 130 Mbit/s.
>>>
>>> 3.37 to 3.5 GHz (the frequency range of the M3 radios) is totally unused
>>> for
>>> the most part.  A complete link is well under $1000 including antennas.
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PSDR mailing list
>> PSDR at hamwan.org
>> http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PSDR mailing list
> PSDR at hamwan.org
> http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.hamwan.net/pipermail/psdr/attachments/20180329/a0a17726/attachment.html>


More information about the PSDR mailing list