<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
The only "authentication" the radio has, are the following:<br>
<ol>
<li>The radio can be set to only receive remote transmissions that
include a two-digit decimal code; <b>or</b></li>
<li>The radio can be set to only receive remote transmissions that
are addressed to the callsign programmed into the receiving
radio (I would recommend this setting).<br>
</li>
</ol>
Any other authentication would have to be provided by a router or
firewall.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2014-04-26 22:39, Bart Kus wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:535C980B.6090504@bartk.us" type="cite">Any
packets on that LAN are considered trusted since they passed
authentication. What's the auth story on the 23cm modems?
<br>
<br>
--Bart
<br>
<br>
On 4/26/2014 10:37 PM, Tom Hayward wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Dean
Gibson AE7Q <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:hamwan@ae7q.com"><hamwan@ae7q.com></a> wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">At the Snohomish County DEM, place a
router (or bridge) between the ID-1 and
the 44.24.240.x network.
<br>
In this scenario, the ID-1 located at my house would also be
connected to a
router that acts as though it were directly connected to the
44.24.240.x (or
any other) network at the DEM.
<br>
</blockquote>
We have a router at Snohomish County DEM with an extra port that
could
be used for this. The subnet there is 44.24.240.128/28. We have
another subnet of address pairs set aside for router-to-router
links.
So as far as networking goes, we could execute your plan. I
can't
commend about the feasibility of any of the other bits.
<br>
<br>
Tom
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>