If you are ever in West Seattle, in the Junction area, look for the old microwave tower. You will see two antennas. One is horizontal and one is vertical polarized. This helps a lot over water. When I worked at the TV station we did this also with the microwave links. <div>
Very common, and it can even occur in fog.</div><div><br></div><div>Steve<br><br>On Tuesday, May 6, 2014, Matthew Lawson <<a href="mailto:kc7eqo@gmail.com">kc7eqo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>Its called tidal multipath. you are getting a reflected signal that is causing cancellation or attenuation from the AP (source). take for example a sign wave and mix it with another sign wave at the same frequency but change the phase a little or a lot you will get addition or subtraction, depending on the phase. when the waves are 180 degrees<b> out of phase</b> they will cancel each other, but as you shift phase they will attenuate or add to each other. when both waves are <b>in phase</b> with each other you will have a stronger signal. I am not a very good typist or writer, so I hope this makes sense. I have in the past plotted (graphed) RSL vs tidal height for microwave links over water. Its pretty neat to see the correlation of tide versus RSL. <br>
<br></div>Another great example of multipath was when TV was analog you would get ghosting. This is a great visual of multipath. As you receive a direct signal at a given point in time you are also receiving the same signal at a slightly delayed point in time. Thus a ghost image would appear due to the time delay. You also used to be able see the picture flutter due to Doppler shift mixed with multipath as an airplane would fly over at the right path. <br>
<br></div>Hope this helps in understanding on what going on. <br><br>73<br></div>Matthew Lawson<br></div>KC7EQO<br></div>442.100 Blyn Mt Repeater<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Benjamin Krueger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ben.krueger@gmail.com');" target="_blank">ben.krueger@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">It would also be interesting to see two of these test setups, some reasonable distance apart, using one as the control and doing adjustments on the other.<br>
<br>Tom, fwiw, I have all the same gear you do. We could set mine up for this kind of thing.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Mike Culver <span dir="ltr"><<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mculver@extencia.com');" target="_blank">mculver@extencia.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">So signal strength is clearly correlated to the moon :)<br>
________________________________________<br>
From: PSDR <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','psdr-bounces@hamwan.org');" target="_blank">psdr-bounces@hamwan.org</a>> on behalf of Tom Hayward <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','esarfl@gmail.com');" target="_blank">esarfl@gmail.com</a>><br>
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 10:59 AM<br>
To: Puget Sound Data Ring<br>
Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWAN over tideflats<br>
<div><div><br>
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Bart Kus <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','me@bartk.us');" target="_blank">me@bartk.us</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> That's a cool observation. I would caution against equating correlation with causation though.<br>
<br>
Agreed.<br>
<br>
> "The effect of tides on signal level" may indeed be an effect of temperature changes (ducting?) or something else.<br>
<br>
Temperature didn't change much all day.<br>
<br>
> If I recall correctly, you were seeing very large (10dB?) high frequency (1s period?) signal swings.<br>
<br>
Nope. I never saw more than 1 dB change during a 10 second period<br>
(never really watched it for longer periods than that). The signal<br>
very smoothly increased as the tide came in from the minimum to the<br>
maximum I shared earlier. As it rose, I never saw it dip again by more<br>
than 1 dB.<br>
<br>
> It'd be fun to understand that phenomenon as well as the slower one you're reporting here. Perhaps you were just being slowly moved through an interference node with the water level, and an antenna mounted +/- 2ft from your antenna's elevation might have reported the opposite power behavior? I also wonder if there is any polarization rotation happening here.<br>
<br>
Maybe I should try the same location with a MIMO modem.<br>
<br>
Tom KD7LXL<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PSDR mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','PSDR@hamwan.org');" target="_blank">PSDR@hamwan.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org" target="_blank">http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PSDR mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','PSDR@hamwan.org');" target="_blank">PSDR@hamwan.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org" target="_blank">http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div></div></div><span><font color="#888888">-- <br><div dir="ltr">Benjamin<br></div>
</font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
PSDR mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','PSDR@hamwan.org');" target="_blank">PSDR@hamwan.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org" target="_blank">http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div>