<p dir="ltr">Good point Bart, very curious to see what's going on. I didn't pay attention if lat and long of both source and subscriber were posted. Would like to see the terrain profile.</p>
<p dir="ltr">73</p>
<p dir="ltr">Matthew Lawson<br>
KC7EQO<br>
442.100 Blyn Mt Repeater </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On May 6, 2014 11:08 PM, "Bart Kus" <<a href="mailto:me@bartk.us">me@bartk.us</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div>Matthew,<br>
      <br>
      The wavelength here is 5cm.  Which means the 1/2 wavelength (180
      degree phase shift) is 2.5cm.  I think the tide decreases the
      water level by far more than 2.5cm.  He'd start seeing
      constructive interference again every 5cm.  But he didn't.  He saw
      a smooth gradual reduction the whole way through (right?).<br>
      <br>
      My current theory on this is that the mud that was exposed is far
      less reflective to 6GHz than the water itself.  I originally
      proposed the multipath idea too, but that was when I thought I
      heard him say there were fast 10dB swings in signal strength,
      which would be consistent with small (water) waves.  But he said
      the whole thing was very smooth, so I don't think it's multipath
      phase interference anymore.<br>
      <br>
      I actually have gear that can measure the reflectivity, absorption
      and transmission of 6GHz through arbitrary materials, if Tom ever
      feels like doing more tests on this phenomenon.<br>
      <br>
      --Bart<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      On 5/6/2014 9:19 PM, Steve wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">If you are ever in West Seattle, in the Junction area,
      look for the old microwave tower. You will see two antennas. One
      is horizontal and one is vertical polarized. This helps a lot over
      water.  When I worked at the TV station we did this also with the
      microwave links. 
      <div>
        Very common, and it can even occur in fog.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Steve<br>
        <br>
        On Tuesday, May 6, 2014, Matthew Lawson <<a href="mailto:kc7eqo@gmail.com" target="_blank">kc7eqo@gmail.com</a>>
        wrote:<br>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>Its called tidal multipath. you are getting a
                      reflected signal that is causing cancellation or
                      attenuation from the AP (source). take for example
                      a sign wave and mix it with another sign wave at
                      the same frequency but change the phase a little
                      or a lot you will get addition or subtraction,
                      depending on the phase.  when the waves are 180
                      degrees<b> out of phase</b> they will cancel each
                      other, but as you shift phase they will attenuate
                      or add to each other. when both waves are <b>in
                        phase</b> with each other you will have a
                      stronger signal. I am not a very good typist or
                      writer, so I hope this makes sense. I have in the
                      past plotted (graphed) RSL vs tidal height for
                      microwave links over water. Its pretty neat to see
                      the correlation of tide versus RSL. <br>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                    Another great example of multipath was when TV was
                    analog you would get ghosting. This is a great
                    visual of multipath. As you receive a direct signal
                    at a given point in time you are also receiving the
                    same signal at a slightly delayed point in time.
                    Thus a ghost image would appear due to the time
                    delay. You also used to be able see the picture
                    flutter due to Doppler shift mixed with multipath as
                    an airplane would fly over at the right path. <br>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                  Hope this helps in understanding on what going on. <br>
                  <br>
                  73<br>
                </div>
                Matthew Lawson<br>
              </div>
              KC7EQO<br>
            </div>
            442.100 Blyn Mt Repeater<br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
            <br>
            <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:41 PM,
              Benjamin Krueger <span dir="ltr"><<a>ben.krueger@gmail.com</a>></span>
              wrote:<br>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                <div dir="ltr">It would also be interesting to see two
                  of these test setups, some reasonable distance apart,
                  using one as the control and doing adjustments on the
                  other.<br>
                  <br>
                  Tom, fwiw, I have all the same gear you do. We could
                  set mine up for this kind of thing.</div>
                <div class="gmail_extra">
                  <div>
                    <div><br>
                      <br>
                      <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 6, 2014 at
                        11:08 AM, Mike Culver <span dir="ltr"><<a>mculver@extencia.com</a>></span>
                        wrote:<br>
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">So signal strength is
                          clearly correlated to the moon :)<br>
                          ________________________________________<br>
                          From: PSDR <<a>psdr-bounces@hamwan.org</a>>
                          on behalf of Tom Hayward <<a>esarfl@gmail.com</a>><br>
                          Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 10:59 AM<br>
                          To: Puget Sound Data Ring<br>
                          Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWAN over
                          tideflats<br>
                          <div>
                            <div><br>
                              On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Bart Kus
                              <<a>me@bartk.us</a>>
                              wrote:<br>
                              ><br>
                              > That's a cool observation.  I would
                              caution against equating correlation with
                              causation though.<br>
                              <br>
                              Agreed.<br>
                              <br>
                              > "The effect of tides on signal level"
                              may indeed be an effect of temperature
                              changes (ducting?) or something else.<br>
                              <br>
                              Temperature didn't change much all day.<br>
                              <br>
                              > If I recall correctly, you were
                              seeing very large (10dB?) high frequency
                              (1s period?) signal swings.<br>
                              <br>
                              Nope. I never saw more than 1 dB change
                              during a 10 second period<br>
                              (never really watched it for longer
                              periods than that). The signal<br>
                              very smoothly increased as the tide came
                              in from the minimum to the<br>
                              maximum I shared earlier. As it rose, I
                              never saw it dip again by more<br>
                              than 1 dB.<br>
                              <br>
                              > It'd be fun to understand that
                              phenomenon as well as the slower one
                              you're reporting here.  Perhaps you were
                              just being slowly moved through an
                              interference node with the water level,
                              and an antenna mounted +/- 2ft from your
                              antenna's elevation might have reported
                              the opposite power behavior?  I also
                              wonder if there is any polarization
                              rotation happening here.<br>
                              <br>
                              Maybe I should try the same location with
                              a MIMO modem.<br>
                              <br>
                              Tom KD7LXL<br>
                              <br>
_______________________________________________<br>
                              PSDR mailing list<br>
                              <a>PSDR@hamwan.org</a><br>
                              <a href="http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org" target="_blank">http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org</a><br>
                              <br>
_______________________________________________<br>
                              PSDR mailing list<br>
                              <a>PSDR@hamwan.org</a><br>
                              <a href="http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org" target="_blank">http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org</a><br>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </blockquote>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                      <br clear="all">
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <span><font color="#888888">-- <br>
                      <div dir="ltr">Benjamin<br>
                      </div>
                    </font></span></div>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                PSDR mailing list<br>
                <a>PSDR@hamwan.org</a><br>
                <a href="http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org" target="_blank">http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org</a><br>
                <br>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
PSDR mailing list
<a href="mailto:PSDR@hamwan.org" target="_blank">PSDR@hamwan.org</a>
<a href="http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org" target="_blank">http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
PSDR mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:PSDR@hamwan.org">PSDR@hamwan.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org" target="_blank">http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>