<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Shouldn't the 10 MHz Plan be bumped down by 5 MHz(or some other amount) to allow 5MHz as a Guard at the top of the Ham Band Plan? I don't know what is on the other side of 5.925GHz; but I'd assume it could be an issue to us. Has that been discussed before and I just missed it? Maybe just 1 or 2 MHz would be sufficient?<BR>
<BR>
We are starting to move forward with the Portland HamWAN. While our frequencies don't have to be the same; it will be simpler if they are. At the ORRC meeting Sunday we discussed the 6cm Ham Band Plan. I am to give a report and recommendation at or before the next meeting. I'll follow your lead on which plan to use. On my initial request I had added the 5MHz for Guard at the upper edge. <BR>
<BR>
73<BR>
<BR>
Ken Tolliver<BR>
K7ICY<BR>
Portland HamWAN<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
FYI:<BR>
Your current HamWAN 10 MHz Plan<BR>
10MHz Sector Plan<BR><PRE> 10MHz guarded 10MHz channels
CH Low Center High Bearing
1 5.915 5.920 5.925 0
2 5.895 5.900 5.905 120
3 5.875 5.880 5.885 240
</PRE>
5.925 is the very top edge of the 6cm Ham Band.<BR><BR><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR> <BR> </div></body>
</html>