<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    So, fun fact: you can still use Winbox even if you disable the "/ip
    service winbox" service.  :)<br>
    <br>
    Winbox is available as both an IP-routable service (/ip service
    winbox), AND as an Ethernet-MAC-level service (/tool mac-server
    mac-winbox).  Disabling the IP one still leaves the MAC one
    accessible, as long as you're on the same Ethernet segment as your
    modem.  The trick with the GUI is to click the MAC address when
    choosing your device, not the IP address.<br>
    <br>
    It's not intuitive, so maybe this email helps folks out.<br>
    <br>
    PS: winbox.exe is a huge security risk and we should probably stop
    recommending it.  It apparently downloads DLLs from the (possibly
    exploited) modem and runs them on your Windows machine, with all
    your user permissions at its disposal.<br>
    <br>
    --Bart<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/1/2019 7:34 PM, Ric Merry wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+obRmY_+iDWX=pwxTyK3f1g9a7SOzvH4m_kFSWx3-XE0gMP3w@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">Thanks Bart! I I ran the client setup page
        verbatim and this was the results with the exception of Winbox
        and Port222. I wanted to stick with Winbox until I was finished
        with the initial setup.
        <div>I just received a new computer this afternoon so will move
          the whole set up along with all Ham related programs over to
          it.</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 3:36 PM
          Bart Kus <<a href="mailto:me@bartk.us"
            moz-do-not-send="true">me@bartk.us</a>> wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Yes, much better.  I also noticed a
            problem on the HamWAN side, where that sector was configured
            for only 5MHz service instead of our normal 10MHz.  I've
            changed the sector config, and you should be getting twice
            the bandwidth now.<br>
            <br>
            I tried to run a speed test, but noticed your
            bandwidth-server was still set to require authentication, so
            I've logged into your modem and turned that off:<br>
            <br>
            [eo@K7ITE-Lookout] > /tool bandwidth-server set
            authenticate=no<br>
            <br>
            I also noticed you still have an "admin" account.  If it's
            not properly password protected, this may be dangerous now
            that your modem is on the Internet.  I have left it
            untouched.<br>
            <br>
            I also noticed you have the "winbox" service running.  This
            is also dangerous, as it's full of exploits.  I have left it
            untouched, but you should probably disable it.  (/ip service
            disable winbox)  We should update the website instructions
            to disable this by default.<br>
            <br>
            I also noticed your ssh is on port 22.  This will get more
            hacking attempts than port 222.  You can change it with /ip
            service set ssh port=222.<br>
            <br>
            With the bandwidth-server available on your end, I ran a
            speed test from the sector to your modem:<br>
            <br>
            <tt>[eo@Lookout-S2] > /tool bandwidth-test 44.25.143.94
              duration=30s direction=transmit</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>                status: running</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>              duration: 29s</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>            tx-current: 38.4Mbps</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>  tx-10-second-average: 35.6Mbps</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>      tx-total-average: 37.5Mbps</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>           random-data: no</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>             direction: transmit</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>               tx-size: 1500</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>      connection-count: 20</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>        local-cpu-load: 20%</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>       remote-cpu-load: 28%</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>[eo@Lookout-S2] > /tool bandwidth-test
              44.25.143.94 duration=30s direction=receive</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>                status: running</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>              duration: 29s</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>            rx-current: 40.8Mbps</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>  rx-10-second-average: 41.7Mbps</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>      rx-total-average: 35.7Mbps</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>          lost-packets: 1285</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>           random-data: no</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>             direction: receive</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>               rx-size: 1500</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>      connection-count: 20</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>        local-cpu-load: 21%</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><tt>       remote-cpu-load: 27%</tt><tt><br>
            </tt><br>
            This is the performance you can expect from a 10MHz MIMO
            link that has good signal.<br>
            <br>
            The current-distance is reported in km, not miles.  It's not
            round-trip distance, just physical distance between the
            modems.  There is a separate metric for round-trip-time,
            which is measured in microseconds: tdma-timing-offset=202. 
            You can do the speed-of-light math to get a more precise
            distance than the 1km granularity reported by the
            "current-distance" field.<br>
            <br>
            --Bart<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <div>On 11/1/2019 3:18 PM, Ric Merry wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div dir="ltr">tx-rate: 6.5Mbps-5MHz/2S<br>
                                 rx-rate: 3.2Mbps-5MHz/1S<br>
                                    ssid: HamWAN<br>
                                   bssid: 74:4D:28:57:F6:BA<br>
                              radio-name: Lookout-S2/WA7DEM<br>
                         signal-strength: -62dBm<br>
                     signal-strength-ch0: -64dBm<br>
                     signal-strength-ch1: -66dBm<br>
                      tx-signal-strength: -62dBm<br>
                  tx-signal-strength-ch0: -66dBm<br>
                  tx-signal-strength-ch1: -64dBm<br>
                             noise-floor: -124dBm<br>
                         signal-to-noise: 62dB<br>
                                  tx-ccq: 35%<br>
                                  rx-ccq: 19%<br>
                   authenticated-clients: 1<br>
                        current-distance: 32<br>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Mo' betta? Is current distance miles in both send
                  and receive (round trip)?</div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at
                  3:06 PM Bart Kus <<a href="mailto:me@bartk.us"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">me@bartk.us</a>>
                  wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
                  0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                  rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> No, you're missing an entire
                    chain of the radio (ch1).  Do this to enable both
                    chains:<br>
                    <br>
                    /interface wireless set 0 rx-chains=0,1
                    tx-chains=0,1<br>
                    <br>
                    --Bart<br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    <div>On 11/1/2019 2:55 PM, Ric Merry wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote type="cite">
                      <div dir="ltr">I climbed back up the ladder to do
                        some fine tuning (thanks for the advice here)
                        <div>Luckily I could remotely view my computer
                          with my cell phone thus saving me the cost of
                          a divorce attorney had I asked my wife to help
                          me when she gets home from work.</div>
                        <div>;)</div>
                        <div>These are my results, I can do more but for
                          now, how do they look?</div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>signal-strength: -66dBm<br>
                               signal-strength-ch0: -66dBm<br>
                                tx-signal-strength: -67dBm<br>
                            tx-signal-strength-ch0: -67dBm<br>
                            tx-signal-strength-ch1: -89dBm<br>
                                       noise-floor: -123dBm<br>
                                   signal-to-noise: 57dB<br>
                                            tx-ccq: 88%<br>
                                            rx-ccq: 70%<br>
                             authenticated-clients: 1<br>
                                  current-distance: 32<br>
                        </div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>Funny things is that thee are about where I
                          started. Elevation is the more difficult
                          adjustment with the brackets provided. I may
                          end up modifying those.</div>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                      <fieldset></fieldset>
                      <pre>_______________________________________________
PSDR mailing list
<a href="mailto:PSDR@hamwan.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">PSDR@hamwan.org</a>
<a href="http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr</a>
</pre>
                    </blockquote>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>